DAILY NEWS

Stay Ahead, Stay Informed – Every Day

Advertisement
The Marshall Emberton III Portable Bluetooth Speaker Is $50 Off Right Now



We may earn a commission from links on this page.
Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

In my years reviewing speakers, I’ve learned a couple of things: Reputation and price get me to buy it, but if I dig the look, I’ll keep using it over better options. This is what Marshall speakers, in general, nail. They look great while still doing their basic job as a portable speaker well. Right now, the Marshall Emberton III is $129.99 (originally $179.99), its lowest price yet, according to price-tracking tools.
My wife and I have been using the Marshall Emberton III for a few months now, and we love it. The moment she first saw it, she fell in love with the look and wanted to keep it on display on the kitchen counter before she even turned it on. We now use it on our kitchen counter and listen to music while we cook or clean up. The Emberton III is a portable speaker, so it’s designed to be taken outdoors, resist the elements with its waterproof IP67 rating, and play for long sessions with its 32-hour playtime. It does all these things well while looking and feeling premium. The sound it produces is distortion-free, even at max volume, which is surprising for a small portable speaker, and it’s loud for its size.

What do you think so far?

The main downside is that there is no adjustable EQ on its app, but it can’t have everything. There are physical controls on top of the speaker to skip songs and pause the media. There is also a battery bar that tells you how much juice you have left. The design is simple yet efficient, and I can’t stress enough how much my wife and I love the retro look of the speaker. You can read more about it on ZDNET’s review. If you’re looking for a fun, good-looking portable speaker you can happily display, get the Marshall Emberton III while it’s at its lowest price.

Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now

Deals are selected by our commerce team



Source link

Google Chrome Finally Added the ‘Approximate Location’ Feature for Android Users


If you told someone twenty-five years ago that, in the near future, people would voluntarily carry devices that share their locations with companies and organizations at all times, they probably wouldn’t believe you. And yet, it’s just one way smartphones have changed the way we think about personal privacy. Of course, not only do we choose to take our smartphones everywhere, but it’s tough to manage modern life without them. But it’s important to note that not all location information is the same: While the default option is often to share your exact coordinates with the app or service that requests it, you often have a second choice that goes a long way to preserving your privacy: “approximate location.” When choosing this option, your phone will only share a rough idea of where you happen to be when asked, rather than a pinpoint address. It’s perfect for the times when knowing your general location is necessary for an app to function, but not your exact location. If you’re looking for a restaurant in your area, you might just want to share the city or zip code you’re in, not your home address. If you want to know what the weather will be tomorrow, that doesn’t require your precise whereabouts either. There are exceptions, of course, like navigation apps that need to know exactly where you are to track you, or when you want to find the closest convenience store to your current location. But, often, approximate location is the better choice than precise location when sharing this information with apps. Chrome for Android finally allows you to share your approximate location That’s why I find it so surprising to learn that, until now, Google Chrome for Android has not allowed you to share your approximate location with websites. Unlike Android itself, which has the option, Chrome was all or nothing with your location: If you needed to share that info with a website, you’d better be comfortable sending your current spot.
No longer: Starting this week, you’ll see a new pop-up when a website asks you for your location information. Rather than answer a basic all-or-nothing question, the menu will ask whether you’d like to share your precise, exact location, or your approximate, neighborhood location. You can even see the difference from a thumbnail preview of a map: “Precise” will share a pinpoint location, while “Approximate” will share a rough radius. You’ll have the usual subsequent options here as well: “Allow while visiting the site,” “Allow this time,” or “Never allow.”

What do you think so far?

Credit: Google

It’s not clear whether you’ll receive the pop-up for websites you’ve already granted location access for. But you can manage your location settings at any time to change the options that may already be in effect. To do so, open Chrome, tap the three dots to the right of the address bar, then hit “Settings.” Then, under “Advanced,” choose Site settings > Location. From here, adjust your location settings. Interestingly, Google says this functionality is currently in development for desktop. That means, for the time being, you’ll still need to make the all-or-nothing decision with sharing your Chrome location on Mac or PC.



Source link

The Fitbit Air Is Real, and It May Actually Be a Whoop Killer



We may earn a commission from links on this page.

The rumors are true: Google has announced a $99.99 smart band called the Fitbit Air, and is relaunching the Fitbit app as Google Health. There’s a lot here I’m excited about: an affordable smart band without a mandatory subscription, with a full-featured app that may, if Google’s promises check out, offer a meaningful alternative to Whoop’s app. Here’s what we know about the band, and how it’s going to fit into the ecosystem if you already have a Fitbit or a Pixel Watch. The band is impressively lightweight and comfortable-looking

Left: the Fitbit Air from the underside, showing how the device fits into the strap. Right: what the device looks like when removed.
Credit: Fitbit

I haven’t yet seen the Fitbit Air in person (although I expect to give you a hands-on review soon), but from the pictures, I’m impressed with the design. Remember when I was trying to figure out from photos whether the device is attached to the strap, since I couldn’t see a connecting piece? Well, it turns out that the Fitbit Air device (the “pebble”) pops into the underside of the strap, like the old Fitbit Flex. That means you can swap out the strap for a different color or material, without any hardware showing. The device is 1.4 inches by 0.7 inches by 0.3 inches. It weighs 5.2 grams, and 12 grams with the band. The color offerings include black, light gray, a bluish color that Fitbit calls Lavender, and a pinkish red it calls Berry. (Lavender is shown in the image at the top of this page.) So what happened to the gray-and-orange band Stephen Curry has been wearing? That’s a special edition, complete with his jersey number worked into the stitching. It will retail for $129.99. With a regular band, the price is $99.99. Replacement bands (without the device) will retail for $34.99. The Fitbit Air is available to pre-order now, and will ship later this month.
What the Fitbit Air actually doesThe Fitbit Air, like the Whoop and other smart bands before it, is mainly a heart rate sensor that can pair to your phone. There is no display; if you want to see your heart rate during a workout, you’ll need to check that from your phone. Unlike the old Fitbit Flex, which had some indicator lights, the Fitbit Air doesn’t have any kind of display. The Fitbit Air also includes accelerometers to detect motion, a blood oxygen sensor, and a vibration motor. There is a temperature sensor so the device can report skin temperature variations, but Google said in a briefing that it’s not sensitive enough for menstrual cycle tracking. The device also has enough storage to hang onto your workout data for a day before needing to sync to your phone, so you don’t need to have your phone with you for every workout. You can now pair a Fitbit and a Pixel Watch to the same phoneI have good news and bad news on multi-device support. Fitbit users have long complained that the Fitbit app only allows you to pair one device. Pixel watches use this same app, so when I reviewed the Pixel Watch 4 I had to unpair the Fitbit Charge 6 that I had previously paired. That is changing! You will now be able to pair a Pixel Watch and a Fitbit.But that is specifically the only combination you’ll be able to do, Google says: one Pixel and one Fitbit. So you can wear a Pixel Watch and swap it for a Fitbit Air for workouts or sleep or any time you don’t want a watch on your wrist. But you can’t swap between a Fitbit Charge 6 and a Fitbit Air, or between any other two Fitbits. That’s a shame for people who already own a Fitbit device that tells the time.The Fitbit Public Preview will become the new Google Health appThe Fitbit app is getting an overhaul and a new name, and it sounds like it’s going to be great. That said, my initial experiments with the Public Preview did not inspire confidence. I found that the AI coach hallucinated freely, kept forgetting my goals, and generally made a terrible coach.

What do you think so far?

Google says it’s been listening to feedback, and that fixes are either in the works or have already been applied. The Public Preview was missing key features while it was in development, like nutrition tracking, but those will be available at the relaunch. Google says the developers have made information easier to find, the coach less verbose, and the coach now tracks your progress toward weekly goals. I’m looking forward to trying the app, and I won’t pull any punches if the coach still has serious flaws. It doesn’t exactly inspire confidence that I saw this on Reddit yesterday: A Public Preview user said that the coach keeps insisting they need to wake up at 5:30 a.m. and recently went through a big move, neither of which were true. Another redditor replied to say they were a product manager at Google and said “sorry to hear about these hallucinations. we’ve seen a number of these and have made some progress getting rid of them, so it’s helpful to dig into the ones that are still happening.” If Google can successfully address the coach’s issues, I’m going to be really impressed with the app. I’ve been saying for years that you don’t make a Whoop killer by sticking a heart rate monitor on a wrist band—Whoop’s strength is its incredibly full-featured app that integrates all your data into actionable advice. I love Whoop’s app for its weekly plans and I’ve joked that the Whoop Coach is “the only AI I’m on speaking terms with.” Fitbit’s new app will have weekly plans, and its coach is programmed to take input from conversations and to access data from throughout the app. It sounds a lot more useful than a lot of fitness app chatbots. How the Fitbit Air compares to other smart bandsI’m honestly excited for this. There are now multiple smart bands on the market, but the Fitbit Air seems to be hitting a sweet spot that none of the others have gotten quite right. Whoop is undeniably the leader, but its $239/year subscription is a lot for most of us to swallow. Polar’s no-subscription Loop band sounded promising, but ultimately doesn’t do very much, and it’s $200. Amazfit’s Helio strap was my favorite of the bunch, with a $99.99 price tag, no subscription, and the ability to trade off with other Amazfit devices (like the company’s sports watches) in a no-frills app. The Fitbit Air combines the low price tag, no subscription, and (possibly) a full-featured, easy-to-use app. It can feed data to the same app as a watch you might already be wearing—at least if you’re a Pixel watch user. I’m looking forward to trying it out and seeing whether the app keeps its promises well enough to give it the edge over other smart bands.



Source link