DAILY NEWS

Stay Ahead, Stay Informed – Every Day

Advertisement
G.K. Chesterton on How to Dig for the “Submerged Sunrise of Wonder” – The Marginalian



There is a myth we live with, the myth of finding the meaning of life — as if meaning were an undiscovered law of physics. But unlike the laws of physics — which predate us and will postdate us and made us — meaning only exists in this brief interlude of consciousness between chaos and chaos, the interlude we call life. When you die — when these organized atoms that shimmer with fascination and feeling — disband into disorder to become unfeeling stardust once more, everything that filled your particular mind and its rosary of days with meaning will be gone too. From its particular vantage point, there will be no more meaning, for the point itself will have dissolved — there will only be other humans left, making meaning of their own lives, including any meaning they might make of the residue of yours.
These are the thoughts coursing through this temporary constellation of consciousness as I pause at the lush mid-June dandelion at the foot of the hill on my morning run — the dandelion, now a fiesta of green where a season ago the small sun of its bloom had been, then the ethereal orb of its seeds, now long dispersed; the dandelion, existing for no better reason than do I, than do you — and no worse — by the same laws of physics beyond meaning: these clauses of exquisite precision punctuated by chance.
Nebular by Maria Popova. (Available as a print, benefitting The Nature Conservancy)
And yet, somehow, against the staggering cosmic odds otherwise, we get to experience this sky, these trees, these colors, these loves we live. The recognition of this unbidden miracle of chance is the fundamental matter of meaning — the great awakening from the myth.
How to awaken to this miraculousness and begin to make meaning is, of course, the great creative challenge of life.
All of this — the dandelion, the insistence on wonder as the sieve for meaning — reminded me of a some passages by G.K. Chesterton (May 29, 1874–June 14, 1936) — philosopher, impassioned early eugenics opponent, prolific author of several dozen books, several hundred poems and short stories, and several thousand essays — from The Autobiography of G.K. Chesterton (public library).
G.K. Chesterton at seventeen
A century after Baudelaire observed that “genius is nothing more nor less than childhood recovered at will,” and a generation before Dylan Thomas insisted that “children in wonder watching the stars, is the aim and the end,” Chesterton looks back on his early life and how it fomented the animating ethos of his later life as a literary artist and thinker:
What was wonderful about childhood is that anything in it was a wonder. It was not merely a world full of miracles; it was a miraculous world.
With an eye to the absurdity of pessimism as a life-orientation, given the astonishing good luck of existing at all in a universe where the probability is overwhelmingly against it, he adds:
No man* knows how much he is an optimist, even when he calls himself a pessimist, because he has not really measured the depths of his debt to whatever created him and enabled him to call himself anything. At the back of our brains… [there is] a forgotten blaze or burst of astonishment at our own existence. The object of the artistic and spiritual life [is] to dig for this submerged sunrise of wonder; so that a man sitting in a chair might suddenly understand that he [is] actually alive, and be happy.
Once Chesterton found the art through which to channel this blaze of astonishment, he found his writing “full of a new and fiery resolution to write against the Decadents and the Pessimists who ruled the culture of the age.” He reflects:
The primary problem for me, certainly in order of time and largely in order of logic… was the problem of how men could be made to realise the wonder and splendour of being alive, in environments which their own daily criticism treated as dead-alive, and which their imagination had left for dead.
Art by Dorothy Lathrop, 1922. (Available as a print and as stationery cards.)
And so we get to the dandelion:
I had from the first an almost violently vivid sense of those two dangers; the sense that the experience must not be spoilt by presumption or despair… I asked through what incarnations or prenatal purgatories I must have passed, to earn the reward of looking at a dandelion… [or a] sunflower or the sun… But there is a way of despising the dandelion which is not that of the dreary pessimist, but of the more offensive optimist. It can be done in various ways; one of which is saying, “You can get much better dandelions at Selfridge’s,” or “You can get much cheaper dandelions at Woolworth’s.” Another way is to observe with a casual drawl, “Of course nobody but Gamboli in Vienna really understands dandelions,” or saying that nobody would put up with the old-fashioned dandelion since the super-dandelion has been grown in the Frankfurt Palm Garden; or merely sneering at the stinginess of providing dandelions, when all the best hostesses give you an orchid for your buttonhole and a bouquet of rare exotics to take away with you. These are all methods of undervaluing the thing by comparison; for it is not familiarity but comparison that breeds contempt. And all such captious comparisons are ultimately based on the strange and staggering heresy that a human being has a right to dandelions; that in some extraordinary fashion we can demand the very pick of all the dandelions in the garden of Paradise; that we owe no thanks for them at all and need feel no wonder at them at all; and above all no wonder at being thought worthy to receive them.
Dandelion by Jackie Morris from The Lost Spells by Robert Macfarlane — a spell against the erasure of wonder from this world
Find some kindred thought in this epochs-wide meditation on the flower and the meaning of life, starring Emily Dickinson, Michael Pollan, and the Little Prince, then revisit Roar Like a Dandelion — poet Ruth Krauss’s lost serenade to wonder, found and turned into a modern picture-book by artist Sergio Ruzzier.



Source link

The Newest Echo Show Is $50 Off Right Now



We may earn a commission from links on this page.
Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

The Echo Show has come a long way since its humble beginnings. The latest smart display from Amazon came out in the winter of 2025 and, for the first time, brings Fire TV integrated into the display, so you can stream your shows directly on it, as well as Alexa+ AI voice control, among other improvements. Right now, the 11-inch Echo Show 11 is $169.99 (originally $219.99) and the 8-inch Echo Show 8 is $139.99 (originally $179.99), both at their lowest prices according to price-tracking tools.
The Amazon Echo Show 11 replaced the 3rd Generation Echo Show 10. One of the obvious differences is the smaller size, but the screen is actually bigger since the bezels are much smaller, giving it a more modern look. The sound is much better as well, with forward-facing speakers and a subwoofer that can fill up a room with sound. The resolution on the display has been bumped to 1,920 by 1,200 pixels, which is better but still underwhelming considering it’s not 4K. Some of the more subtle upgrades are the new support for Matter, Thread, and Zigbee, essentially covering almost every smart home device. If you had the 3rd Gen Echo Show 10, you’ll notice the physical camera shutter is gone (you can still disable the camera in settings), as well as the swivel camera feature that follows you around (it is now mounted in place). Amazon’s new Alexa+ generative AI is free for Prime members, otherwise, it’ll be $19.99 per month. Alexa+ can do anything you’d expect it to; it’s conversational, can control your devices without needing to say the exact words in the right order, and will remember past conversations. You can check out more details on PCMag’s “excellent” review.

What do you think so far?

The Echo Show 11 and 8 are the same device, even in audio; the only difference is the screen size and the price.

Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now

Deals are selected by our commerce team



Source link

You’re About to See Less Slop on Instagram


Instagram ain’t what it used to be. What started as a simple platform to share retro-inspired photos with friends and family quickly turned into a social media mega-app. You can still share photos, sure, but the platform now offers just about everything, from livestreams to short-form video feeds. In fact, for some users, the Instagram algorithm has turned their feeds into bona fide meme machines, with low-effort videos, images, and carousel posts dominating their experience as they scroll through the app. If you use Instagram, you may have a similar experience—especially if you have a taste for quirky, niche, or otherwise alternative internet humor.Instagram is putting slop on noticeThat’s likely changing in the near future. As reported by TechCrunch, Instagram is cracking down on “unoriginal” content—or posts from creators that they didn’t create themselves. That includes single photo posts, as well as carousel posts. The idea here is to promote Instagram users who post original content, while limiting users who simply copy other people’s work and share it on their own feeds. Much of the low-quality images and videos you see on Instagram (and other social media platforms, for that matter) are stolen from other creators, and reposted as if the uploader has any claim to that content in the first place. Carousels are particular egregious, since it allows a single user to post a number of different images from various creators. This doesn’t mean that any user who reposts something they didn’t make themselves will be punished. As long as the poster made a meaningful change to that image or video, it should count as “original” content, in Instagram’s book. Otherwise, there’d be a whole host of content—memes or otherwise—that would be banned from the platform. That doesn’t include “low-effort edits,” however, such as overlaying watermarks or adjusting the speed of the video. A user needs to make more material changes to a piece of content for it to be approved here. As Instagram explains, “an original meme transforms another creator’s photo or video…When meme creators add humor, social commentary, cultural references, or a relatable take by incorporating elements such as unique text, creative edits, and voiceover on a photo or video, they’re producing something original. The best meme creators take third-party content and make it unmistakably theirs by layering in a perspective, joke, or context that wasn’t there before. This is the kind of creativity we want to continue rewarding.”
You probably won’t notice a change in AI slop, thoughAs TechCrunch highlights, Instagram has already applied these rules to reels, so this isn’t the first time the platform has tried implementing this policy. What I find interesting, however, is there doesn’t appear to be much attention to “AI slop” at this time. In fact, Meta appears to be all-in on AI content, at least as of late 2025. I guess as long as the AI content is “original,” Meta doesn’t have a problem with it populating on its platforms, Instagram included. That’s the opposite approach YouTube is taking: While both platforms suffer from low-quality AI clips, YouTube is actually trying to fight that type of AI content from spreading.

What do you think so far?

On Instagram, however, you might see a decrease in the amount of repeated, low-effort meme posts that may be flooding your feeds, but you also might have to deal with the same amount of odd AI videos that have been spreading like wildfire. Obvious AI videos are obvious, of course, but with advancing AI video models, new clips are sometimes difficult to tell apart from reality. Be careful out there.



Source link