DAILY NEWS

Stay Ahead, Stay Informed – Every Day

Advertisement
Crypto’s Most Powerful PAC Sends a Warning to Politicians: Resistance Is Futile



Congressman Al Green, the incumbent representative for the 18th Congressional District in Texas, lost to fellow House Representative Christian Menefee in a runoff election in the Democratic primary for a seat in Congress on Tuesday, and one crypto-focused political action committee (PAC) announced that the loss should be taken as a warning shot to future candidates. Fairshake and other crypto-related PACs dumped millions of dollars into the primary election to oust Green, who has held a seat in Congress for twenty years. The contest played out across multiple stages following Republican-led redistricting that effectively merged elements of two Houston-area congressional districts into one. The redraw consolidated portions of both incumbents’ districts into a newly drawn 18th, forcing the two Democratic incumbents to compete against each other. In the March primary, both Menefee and Green advanced as the top two finishers but fell short of a majority, forcing the runoff, which Menefee won with nearly 70% of the vote. The victory in the safely Democratic district means Menefee is heavily favored in the November general election. Fairshake and its affiliated group Protect Progress poured millions into backing Menefee, with The Texas Tribune reporting more than $4 million in outside spending from one crypto super PAC alone, the Fairshake-affiliated Protect Progress. According to The Block, Green earned an F rating from the industry-aligned Stand with Crypto group after voting against both the GENIUS stablecoin legislation and the Clarity Act. Green had also publicly warned that digital assets could undermine the dollar’s global dominance and pose risks to national security. In contrast, Menefee received an A rating from the same group and has spoken positively about blockchain’s potential to improve trust, transparency, and efficiency in finance and supply chains.

Once the results became clear, Fairshake released a confrontational statement: “Rep. Green’s defeat proves that anti-crypto hostility carries real electoral consequences, making him the first Democratic incumbent this cycle to lose his seat. Fairshake was the difference-maker in this race, and we will continue to aggressively back leaders like Rep. Menefee across the country.”

The crypto lobby has been credited with giving a massive boost to Donald Trump during the 2024 presidential election following a speech he gave at the 2024 Bitcoin conference in Nashville, Tennessee, where he made several positive statements regarding bitcoin and crypto, including a stated desire to establish a strategic bitcoin reserve. Industry-backed super PACs, including Fairshake, Protect Progress, and Defend American Jobs, spent more than $133 million across federal races that cycle, according to OpenSecrets. Major donors included Coinbase, Ripple, Jump Crypto, and Andreessen Horowitz. A recent New York Times report has pointed to similar concerns around the money involved in the CFTC’s strong stance regarding federal authority over the emerging prediction markets and crypto industries. Among the claims, the report alleges that senior CFTC officials under then-acting chair Caroline Pham helped clear regulatory hurdles for several firms tied to Trump family business interests.

The Trump family’s involvement in the crypto industry more generally has also been heavily criticized for “unprecedented corruption.” Duke University lecturing fellow Lee Reiners recently indicated that the Trump-linked World Liberty Financial stands to benefit tremendously from the Clarity Act, which is currently making its way through the Senate. Reiners, a former bank examiner, analyzed World Liberty Financial’s WLFI token and concluded it functions as an unregistered security under the Howey test due to its structure, profit expectations, and centralized control. If passed as written, the legislation would likely reclassify those tokens as network commodities, moving them outside much of the securities-law framework for disclosures and antifraud enforcement. Critics say that would benefit the Trump family’s crypto interests and deepen concerns about self-dealing and conflicts of interest during the president’s second term. The Clarity Act is intended to clarify how the crypto industry will be regulated in the United States. The specifics of the legislation are still being worked out after intense debate between crypto and banking interests in the U.S. Notably, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong threw his weight around back in March by indicating a previous draft of the bill would be worse than having no bill at all. He cited provisions that would amount to a de facto ban on tokenized equities and impose overly broad restrictions on decentralized finance. Coinbase is a massive contributor to the aforementioned crypto PACs, having given more than $75 million to Fairshake and its affiliates during the 2024 cycle and committing an additional $25 million for the 2026 midterms, according to CNBC. Although the crypto industry has spent massively on political campaigns over the past few years and they were successful in this most recent runoff election in Texas, the Clarity Act is still not a slam dunk, as Democrats (and some Republicans) are pushing for ethics language to prevent the sort of corrupt profiteering by lawmakers that Trump has been alleged to have conducted. 



Source link

Jensen Huang Joins Trump’s Tycoon Entourage in China



            Don’t worry everyone. Jensen Huang is going to China with the president. After a six-week delay due to the Iran war, President Trump arrives in Beijing on Wednesday for a face-to-face summit with President Xi Jinping, a leader he has unabashedly liked and respected since his previous administration. According to CNBC, he’s bringing along a cadre of billionaires and other handsomely compensated chief executives from banking, finance, and tech. The initial list of billionaires was:  Elon Musk Tim Cook Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwartzman Blackrock CEO Larry Fink  Executives and presidents from Boeing, Cargill, Citigroup, Coherent, GE Aerospace, Goldman Sachs, Illumina, Mastercard, Meta, Micron, Qualcomm, and Visa were also on Trump’s travel manifest.

But rather shockingly, Nvidia and its CEO Jensen Huang were conspicuously absent, even though Trump is famously a big fan of Huang’s. This prompted rampant speculation about what this meant for Nvidia’s sales in China. Bloomberg wrote that the snub “represents a potential setback for Huang in his bid to sell Nvidia’s AI chips to China, a market he’s identified as a $50 billion opportunity.” But late on Tuesday, the New York Times wrote that Air Force One picked up Huang in Alaska on the way to China. The flying Voltron of rich people is complete.

As Trump put it on Truth Social: “CNBC incorrectly reported that the Great Jensen Huang, of Nvidia, was not invited to the incredible gathering of the World’s Greatest Businessmen/women proudly going to China. In actuality, Jensen is currently on Air Force One and, unless I ask him to leave, which is highly unlikely, CNBC’s reporting is incorrect or, as they say in politics, FAKE NEWS!” So it’s nice to know that a fifth billionaire, the CEO of the world’s most valuable company, will be able to plead his company’s case to Chinese leaders this week.

Earlier in the day, when fielding questions from reporters about the war in Iran, Trump revealed a bit about how he currently regards Americans of more modest means. When asked if he thinks about Americans’ financial situations during talks, he said “Not even a little bit,” adding even more bluntly seconds later, “I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation.”



Source link

Trump’s Potential New AI Executive Order May Take a Swipe at Anthropic



An executive order reportedly being mulled by President Donald Trump could deepen—or, who knows, resolve?—its ongoing conflict with Anthropic. Yesterday I wrote about reports that Trump was working on creating an AI “working group” by executive order. This group would be made up of government officials and members of the tech industry, and one of its roles might be to devise a review process for unreleased AI models. In other words, after promising a light regulatory touch, Trump might be dipping his toe into creating some AI guardrails. I noted that the Times’ sources compared Trump’s potential working group to a similar group in the process of being created in the U.K., and that that group was spurred into existence by the revelations of security vulnerabilities brought about by Anthropic’s Claude Mythos Preview model.

Yesterday afternoon, the AI companies Microsoft, xAI, and Google all signed deals allowing a Biden-created arm of the Commerce Department called the Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI), to inspect their new models prior to release. Anthropic wasn’t included, but it did sign a similar agreement with CAISI under President Biden in 2024. But new information reported by Politico about the in-progress order says it may prohibit companies from “interfering” with government uses of AI. This is according to four of Politico’s seven anonymous sources cited in the story.

To refresh your memory, Anthropic has been blacklisted by the Pentagon—ostensibly for interfering with the government’s use of its models. It’s a bizarre story with many unanswered questions, but on its face, Anthropic appears to have refused to lift guardrails aimed at preventing the Pentagon from engaging in mass surveillance or full automation of weapons systems, which resulted in a standoff, threats, and ultimately the designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk, and the requirement that all Pentagon contractors cut all business ties with it.

It’s not clear what this even is. Language about “interfering” could either reinforce Anthropic’s pariah status within the Trump Administration, attempt to circumvent it somehow, seek to resolve the matter while saving face, or be purely symbolic. So far the White House has not addressed any of the specific reports about this order, telling Politico discussion before the order is announced is “speculation.”



Source link