DAILY NEWS

Stay Ahead, Stay Informed – Every Day

Advertisement
xAI Got Sued Over Its Gas Turbines, so It Naturally Added More of Them



In April, the NAACP sued Elon Musk’s xAI, alleging the company illegally operated 27 natural gas turbines without an air permit at its data center power plant in Southaven, Mississippi. Despite ongoing litigation, xAI has apparently added another 19 turbines to its fleet. According to the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, the company now has 46 “temporary-mobile” turbines at its Southaven facility, Mississippi Today reported Monday. Internal emails between an MDEQ official and a representative from Trinity Consultants, obtained by the Southern Environmental Law Center and shared with WIRED, reportedly show that xAI installed the additional 19 turbines between late March and early May.

Gizmodo was unable to independently verify these claims, and neither xAI nor the MDEQ immediately responded to a request for comment. Gas turbines surge amid AI boom Gas turbines are internal combustion engines that burn natural gas to spin a turbine and generate energy. Demand for them has surged amid the AI boom—tech companies are increasingly turning to on-site gas turbines to meet the enormous, around-the-clock energy demands of their data centers. They’re more efficient than conventional coal-fired power plants, but like any generator that burns fossil fuels, these turbines emit hazardous air pollutants, including nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, carbon monoxide, and volatile organic compounds. That’s why the Clean Air Act requires companies to obtain an air permit prior to installing and operating them.

In March, Mississippi regulators granted xAI a permit to build a 41-turbine power plant in Southaven to power its Colossus 1 and Colossus 2 data centers, located just across the Mississippi state line in Memphis, Tennessee. A month later, the NAACP, represented by the Southern Environmental Law Center and Earthjustice, sued the company for allegedly operating 27 gas turbines at the Southaven site between August and December 2025—before receiving an air permit.

A misinterpreted loophole? The state let xAI run those turbines during that period because they are mounted on flatbed trailers and therefore fall under a “temporary-mobile” exemption that allows them to operate without an air permit for up to a year, Mississippi Today reports. MDEQ also considers the 19 turbines reportedly added between March and May to be temporary mobile installations. That means no one is monitoring the air pollution generated by these 46 turbines. “Tens of thousands of people, including members of Plaintiffs NAACP and NAACP Mississippi State Conference (‘NAACP MS’), live, worship, study and work in the homes, churches, and schools that immediately surround the Colossus Gas Plant, and hundreds of thousands more live in the greater Memphis area,” the lawsuit states. “A much larger share of this population is Black than that of the country’s population as a whole.”

Southern Environmental Law Center attorneys argue this loophole doesn’t actually apply to xAI’s trailer-mounted turbines. The Clean Air Act defines a stationary turbine as “not self-propelled or intended to be propelled while performing its function. It may, however, be mounted on a vehicle for portability.” Earlier this month, the NAACP filed a request for a preliminary injunction to halt the operation of xAI’s “illegal power plant” while litigation proceeds, arguing that emergency action is necessary to “protect nearby communities that are facing imminent health harms.” The court has not yet ruled on the request.

This case highlights the growing tension between AI’s power demand and public health and safety, with marginalized communities bearing the brunt of the industry’s rapidly expanding impact. The outcome of this lawsuit will either set a precedent for stricter oversight of data center energy infrastructure or reinforce regulatory gray areas that put the public at risk.



Source link

Apple Settles Alleged False Advertising Suit Over AI-Powered Siri



According to the New York Times, if you bought an iPhone 16 or certain iPhone 15 between June of 2024 and March of 2025, you may soon be eligible to receive a check for as much as $95 per device as part of a class action lawsuit related to Apple Intelligence and Siri. The allegedly flawed Apple Intelligence features that were part of the suit originally shipped on iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max in June of 2024. The Apple Intelligence-native iPhone 16 line shipped later that year.

On Tuesday, Apple settled claims in U.S. District Court in San Jose, California over alleged false advertising. The suit argued that Apple led consumers to believe the Apple Intelligence suite of features was more capable than it actually was. The total settlement amount, still awaiting a judge’s approval, is $250 million. Apple maintains that it did nothing wrong. Marni Goldberg, an Apple spokesperson gave a statement to the Times, claiming that beginning with “the launch of Apple Intelligence,” Apple has “introduced dozens of features across many languages that are integrated across Apple’s platforms,” and that the company had “resolved this matter to stay focused on doing what we do best, delivering the most innovative products and services to our users.” This lawsuit was “fallout,” according to Axios, from Apple’s acknowledgement last year that AI upgrades to Siri were not going to be released on schedule. A statement to Daring Fireball at the time said Apple had “been working on a more personalized Siri, giving it more awareness of your personal context, as well as the ability to take action for you within and across your apps,” but added, “It’s going to take us longer than we thought to deliver on these features and we anticipate rolling them out in the coming year.”

The next day, it was reported that Apple had pulled a now-notorious ad starring Bella Ramsey: The ad is a nice summary of the “more personal” Siri concept that still has not been realized. We see Ramsey notice a person whose name they know they should know, so they quickly ask Siri “the name of the guy I had a meeting with a couple of months ago at Cafe Grenel?” It’s up to the viewer to presume this beefed-up version of Siri is able to use this prompt to draw on, say, an email, and produce the right answer. It immediately replies, “You met Zac Wingate at Cafe Grenel a couple of months ago.” 

To put this class action settlement in context, Apple had been struggling mightily with Siri ever since—deservedly or not—ChatGPT created new consumer expectations for an AI-powered assistant. “AI is what most investors are really excited about. Almost all momentum in the market in general is being fueled by AI,” a portfolio manager named Brian Mulberry told the Wall Street Journal in February of 2024. Mulberry lamented that “Apple really hasn’t made a big splash in the AI space yet.”    So the Apple Intelligence rollout was perceived as coming late, but it was also, it seems, too early—given that it was sued and ended up settling for $250 million. In an interview with TechRadar last year after the smoke cleared around Siri’s underperformance, Apple software chief Craig Federighi explained that the company was working on a “version 2” of the new Siri that would work in all the personalized ways consumers had come to expect, but that Apple was no longer publicly offering a speculative release schedule for that version.



Source link