DAILY NEWS

Stay Ahead, Stay Informed – Every Day

Advertisement
Ex-OpenAI CTO Mira Murati Testifies About Sam Altman Allegedly Lying to Her



OpenAI’s former CTO Mira Murati just testified under oath that CEO Sam Altman didn’t tell the truth to her, and that his habits interfered with her ability to do her job. The allegation in question, that Altman lied about safety practices, was already public, having featured heavily in a recent New Yorker feature about Altman. Now it’s court testimony. For a few weird days in 2023, Murati was an interim CEO of OpenAI after Altman was briefly fired (And then OpenAI very briefly picked another CEO, Emmett Shear). Reports from this chaotic time paint a picture of a working relationship between Altman and Murati that came under strain when Murati lost Altman’s trust. Behind-the-scenes accounts say she sent memos to the company’s board of directors and Altman himself, questioning Altman’s managerial abilities, and that his termination soon followed.

On Wednesday, a video deposition from Murati was shown to the court during the Musk v. Altman court proceedings, in which she testified to the truth of this story. A new model was being prepared for release—which the New Yorker says was GPT-4 Turbo—and in her testimony, as described by the Verge, she said Altman told her OpenAI’s legal department, headed at the time by Jason Kwon, said it wasn’t necessary for the OpenAI safety board to review the model. The person asking questions in the deposition asked, “As you understand it, was Mr. Altman telling the truth when he made that statement to you?”

To which Murati said, “No.” She later explained in her testimony, according to the Verge, “I confirmed that what Jason was saying and what Sam was saying were not the same thing.” She characterized this as a “misalignment” between Altman and Kwon. Kwon is now OpenAI’s chief strategy officer.

According to Reuters, Murati said in her testimony, “My concern was about Sam saying one thing to one person and completely the opposite to another person.” She also reportedly testified that Altman had been “creating chaos.” She described OpenAI at this time as “at catastrophic risk of falling apart,” and said she was “concerned about the company completely blowing up,” according to Reuters. According to the New Yorker, Murati’s memos to Altman and the board came soon after this interaction, and “Soon afterward, the board made its decision to fire Altman.” Murati was interim CEO for a handful of days, then Shear stepped in for a few days, and then Altman was reinstated, a move Murati publicly supported.

According to Forbes, Murati testified Wednesday that after his return to OpenAI, Altman continued with behaviors that had worried her, including delays around important decisions, and giving inconsistent messages to different coworkers, which she reportedly said created a “very difficult and chaotic environment.” About ten months after Sam Altman was reinstated as CEO, Murati left, and a few month later, founded her own AI company.



Source link

Musk Seemingly Tried to Strong-Arm a Settlement Out of OpenAI Before Trial



Elon Musk is in the middle of a multi-billion-dollar lawsuit alleging that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and President Greg Brockman violated the company’s principles by pursuing profitability. A new document in the case, filed Monday by OpenAI’s counsel, shows that he tried to put an end to it before it began. Per the filing, Musk sent a text to Brockman two days before the trial was set to begin to try to secure a settlement. On April 25, Musk allegedly sent Brockman a text that was meant (according to a description from the defendant’s attorneys) to gauge interest in a potential settlement. Brockman apparently responded to the message with the suggestion that both sides of the case drop their claims. Musk responded, “By the end of this week, you andSam will be the most hated men in America. If you insist, so it will be.”

OpenAI’s representatives said they “do not intend to introduce a screenshot of the exchange into evidence,” so we’re stuck going off their description of the exchange. It seems the plan is to introduce the text into evidence so that they can ask Brockman about it when he takes the witness stand to testify. OpenAI’s filing did include some context, less about this case and more about Musk’s modus operandi. It included a similar settlement “threat” made during litigation over his bid to acquire Twitter and subsequent failed attempt to get out of the deal. That, OpenAI argued, “tends to prove motive and bias, and, in particular, that Mr. Musk’s motivation in pursuing this lawsuit is to attack a competitor and its principals.” They argued the settlement offer, paired with a threat to make Altman and Brockman “the most hated men in America,” was “coercive rather than conciliatory.”

Altman and Brockman aren’t exactly popular (well, Brockman isn’t really known to most of the public), but Musk has a real uphill climb in trying to make them more hated than himself. A YouGov poll from earlier this year found that 56% of the general public held unfavorable views of Musk, compared to 34% who had positive associations with the oligarch. It’s not clear that spending much of last week testifying will help Musk’s image among those who are paying attention. He repeatedly lost his cool and revealed that at least some of his public bluster about his companies is little more than smoke and mirrors.

That’s not to say Altman is beloved in comparison to Musk, seeing as a Tech Oversight poll conducted last year found 50% of people have a negative view of OpenAI’s CEO. Altman also typically doesn’t do himself many favors when speaking publicly—it turns out most people don’t have fond feelings when a rich guy coldly says things like “I expect some really bad stuff to happen because of the technology” and then continues to develop the technology. But it seems like the best case here for Musk is that he wins a very South Park-ian Giant Douche vs. Turd Sandwich-style popularity contest.



Source link