DAILY NEWS

Stay Ahead, Stay Informed – Every Day

Advertisement
PostgreSQL 22034 Error: Causes and Solutions Complete Guide


PostgreSQL Error 22034: more than one sql json item

PostgreSQL error code 22034 (more than one sql json item) occurs when a SQL/JSON function such as JSON_VALUE() or JSON_QUERY() encounters a JSON path expression that returns more than one item, while the function context expects exactly one. This error became more prevalent with the introduction of SQL-standard JSON functions in PostgreSQL 15 and later.

Top 3 Causes

1. Wildcard path in JSON_VALUE() returning multiple results

JSON_VALUE() strictly requires a single scalar return value. Using a wildcard like $across an array will match multiple elements and immediately trigger error 22034.

— Triggers 22034
SELECT JSON_VALUE(‘{“fruits”: (“apple”, “banana”, “cherry”)}’, ‘$.fruits’);

— Fix: specify an explicit index
SELECT JSON_VALUE(‘{“fruits”: (“apple”, “banana”, “cherry”)}’, ‘$.fruits(0)’);
— Result: “apple”

— Fix: suppress the error gracefully
SELECT JSON_VALUE(
‘{“fruits”: (“apple”, “banana”, “cherry”)}’,
‘$.fruits’
NULL ON ERROR
);
— Result: NULL

Enter fullscreen mode

Exit fullscreen mode

2. JSON_QUERY() without WITH ARRAY WRAPPER on multi-value paths

JSON_QUERY() also fails when a path resolves to multiple independent values and no wrapper option is provided to consolidate them into a single JSON array.

— Triggers 22034
SELECT JSON_QUERY(‘{“scores”: (95, 87, 76)}’, ‘$.scores’);

— Fix: wrap results into a JSON array
SELECT JSON_QUERY(
‘{“scores”: (95, 87, 76)}’,
‘$.scores’
WITH ARRAY WRAPPER
);
— Result: (95, 87, 76)

Enter fullscreen mode

Exit fullscreen mode

3. Navigating nested array structures with simple path expressions

Deeply nested JSON arrays compound the cardinality problem at every path step. Using JSON_VALUE() or JSON_QUERY() on paths that traverse multiple array levels without index constraints will almost always produce multiple results.

— Sample nested data
WITH doc AS (
SELECT ‘{“orders”: ({“id”:1}, {“id”:2}, {“id”:3})}’::jsonb AS data
)

— Triggers 22034 (multiple ids returned)
— SELECT JSON_VALUE(data::json, ‘$.orders.id’) FROM doc;

— Fix: use jsonb_path_query() to return a set of rows
SELECT jsonb_path_query(data, ‘$.orders.id’)
FROM doc;

— Fix: use jsonb_array_elements() for row-by-row processing
SELECT elem->>’id’ AS order_id
FROM doc, jsonb_array_elements(data->’orders’) AS elem;

Enter fullscreen mode

Exit fullscreen mode

Quick Fix Solutions

Scenario
Recommended Fix

Need only the first value
Use $.array(0) explicit index

Need all values as JSON array
JSON_QUERY(… WITH ARRAY WRAPPER)

Need all values as rows

jsonb_path_query() or jsonb_array_elements()

Want to avoid query failure
Add NULL ON ERROR clause

Complex nested structures
Use JSON_TABLE() (PostgreSQL 17+)

— JSON_TABLE() for structured unnesting (PostgreSQL 17+)
SELECT *
FROM JSON_TABLE(
‘{“orders”: ({“id”:1,”amt”:100},{“id”:2,”amt”:250})}’::json,
‘$.orders’
COLUMNS (
order_id INT PATH ‘$.id’,
amount INT PATH ‘$.amt’
)
) AS jt;

Enter fullscreen mode

Exit fullscreen mode

Prevention Tips

Always verify path cardinality before using scalar JSON functions.Before deploying queries with JSON path expressions into production, use jsonb_path_query_array() to check how many items a path returns. If the count exceeds one, switch to a set-returning function or add WITH ARRAY WRAPPER.

— Pre-flight cardinality check
SELECT jsonb_array_length(
jsonb_path_query_array(your_column, ‘$.some.path’)
)
FROM your_table
LIMIT 10;

Enter fullscreen mode

Exit fullscreen mode

Always declare explicit error and empty behavior clauses.Never rely on default behavior for SQL/JSON functions. Explicitly specifying NULL ON ERROR and NULL ON EMPTY prevents a single malformed or unexpectedly multi-valued JSON document from failing an entire query batch — especially critical when handling externally sourced JSON data.

SELECT JSON_VALUE(
payload::json,
‘$.event.type’
NULL ON EMPTY
NULL ON ERROR
)
FROM event_log;

Enter fullscreen mode

Exit fullscreen mode

Related Errors

22033 – invalid sql json subscript: bad array index in path expression

22032 – invalid json text: malformed JSON, often encountered before 22034

22035 – no sql json item: the opposite of 22034; path matches nothing

2203A – sql json scalar required: path returns an object/array where a scalar is expected

📖 Want a more detailed guide?Check out the full in-depth version (Korean) on oraerror.com — includes detailed analysis, additional SQL examples, and prevention tips.



Source link

Delete record using JooqTemplate – DEV Community


1. delete

Delete records matching the given condition.

// Single Condition
public int delete(String table, Condition condition)
public int delete(Table table, Condition condition)
// List
public int delete(String table, ListCondition> conditions)
public int delete(Table table, ListCondition> conditions)

Enter fullscreen mode

Exit fullscreen mode

Returns: int — number of affected rows.Example:

jt.delete(“user_table”, F(“id”).eq(100));
jt.delete(“user_table”, Arrays.asList(F(“id”).eq(100)));

Enter fullscreen mode

Exit fullscreen mode

2. deletev (varargs conditions)

Specify delete conditions via varargs.

public int deletev(String table, Object… conditions)
public int deletev(Table table, Object… conditions)

Enter fullscreen mode

Exit fullscreen mode

Returns: int — number of affected rows.Example:

// Delete by equality
jt.deletev(“user_table”, “id”, 100);

// Multiple conditions WHERE name = ? AND birthday >= ?
jt.deletev(“user_table”, “name”, “John”, “birthday>=”, beginDate);

Enter fullscreen mode

Exit fullscreen mode



Source link

PostgreSQL Benchmarking Tool & SQLite Internals: API Error Handling, Join Optimization


PostgreSQL Benchmarking Tool & SQLite Internals: API Error Handling, Join Optimization

Today’s Highlights

This week’s highlights feature a new multi-backend benchmarking tool for PostgreSQL, alongside deep dives into SQLite’s C API error handling and practical insights into optimizing joins with CASE statements.

paradedb/benchmarker: a workload agnostic, multi-backend benchmarking tool. (r/PostgreSQL)

Source: https://reddit.com/r/PostgreSQL/comments/1tbh7j2/paradedbbenchmarker_a_workload_agnostic/

The ParadeDB team has open-sourced Benchmarker, a new workload-agnostic, multi-backend benchmarking framework built on top of Grafana k6. This tool is designed to provide comprehensive insights into database performance, with a strong initial focus on PostgreSQL. It allows developers and database administrators to rigorously test database configurations, versions, and even different database systems under various synthetic and real-world workloads.

Benchmarker helps users understand latency, throughput, and resource utilization by enabling them to define custom test scenarios using a JavaScript API (k6 scripts). This capability is crucial for identifying performance bottlenecks, validating the impact of database changes, and ensuring new systems meet stringent performance requirements before they are deployed to production. By offering a standardized and repeatable method for performance measurement, the tool significantly aids in effective performance tuning and strategic migration planning within the PostgreSQL ecosystem and beyond.

Comment: This looks like a robust, open-source framework for database performance engineers. Leveraging k6 is smart, offering a flexible way to compare PostgreSQL performance across different setups and prevent regressions.

Reply: sqlite3_create_function_v2() error handling inconsistency (SQLite Forum)

Source: https://sqlite.org/forum/info/050cbc2c58fd2c05e80e6d4ebc6cb264611f676f7b339d1e1f0876163e066e5e

A discussion on the SQLite forum explores a potential inconsistency in the error handling mechanisms of SQLite’s sqlite3_create_function_v2() C API. This function is fundamental for developers who want to extend SQLite’s capabilities by registering custom SQL functions, embedding application-specific logic directly into the database engine. The thread delves into the nuances of how errors—such as invalid input, runtime exceptions within the custom function, or resource limitations—are expected to be propagated and handled by the API.

Understanding these error propagation paths is critical for building robust and reliable SQLite extensions. Inconsistent behavior can lead to unpredictable application crashes, data integrity issues, or extremely difficult-to-debug problems in embedded database environments. The conversation likely dissects specific code examples, return values, and internal SQLite error codes, offering insights into best practices for ensuring custom functions gracefully handle errors and communicate them effectively back to the SQLite core and the calling application.

Comment: Debugging error paths in C APIs can be a nightmare. This deep dive into sqlite3_create_function_v2()’s error handling is essential for anyone serious about writing stable, performant SQLite extensions.

Reply: Joins with CASE statement dont match index (SQLite Forum)

Source: https://sqlite.org/forum/info/1a8da89554683ba858846d409c820d0bb96154ee7c2ba5ea8b9b19a3e6c09eed

This SQLite forum thread tackles a common performance challenge: when SQL queries using JOIN operations in conjunction with CASE statements fail to leverage existing database indexes efficiently. In SQLite, as with many relational databases, effective index utilization is paramount for query performance, particularly when dealing with large datasets. The issue arises because CASE expressions within a join condition or WHERE clause can sometimes obfuscate the underlying logic, preventing the query optimizer from recognizing and applying relevant indexes, often resulting in costly full table scans.

The discussion provides invaluable insights for performance tuning in the SQLite ecosystem, shedding light on the internal workings of its query planner. It likely explores specific query patterns, demonstrates the impact using EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN outputs, and proposes practical workarounds. These might include refactoring complex CASE logic into separate computed columns or pre-processing data to enable index usage, helping developers to significantly improve query execution speed while maintaining data accuracy.

Comment: Hitting optimizer limits with CASE statements in joins is a classic performance gotcha. This SQLite discussion provides crucial insights for crafting efficient queries and understanding when to refactor complex logic to enable index scans.



Source link