While checking out of a recent medical appointment, I was suddenly horrified to realize the front desk receptionist I was speaking with had on a pair of Meta x Ray Ban smart glasses.“Those aren’t filming, right” I asked, mentally pre-filing my HIPAA violation suit. She seemed surprised to even receive such a question, taking a moment to clock that I was referring to the recording device on her face that has been embroiled in controversies. No, she assured me, once it clicked, the camera wasn’t on. She was only using them to listen to music. Resisting the urge to suggest that the AirPods lying on her desk might better serve that purpose, I opted to leave the convo there, further surrendering myself to the idea that I am part of a dying breed who actually cares about the existential privacy invasions presented by a population paying to be walking panopticons.
Despite complaints from women recorded without their knowledge and consent by creeps sporting them—who are then extorted for money when they ask for the published video to be taken down—wearing smart glasses in public is not (yet) being treated like the breach of social contract it inherently is, in or out of doctors offices. In fact, the number of units sold just keeps going up. A Q4 earnings report from Ray-Ban’s parent company, EssilorLuxottica, showed that sales for the wearables had tripled in 2025 over the previous year. It will come as no surprise to anyone that one of the biggest names in consumer tech is planning to carve out a big slice of that market for themselves.Recent reporting by Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman confirms what we all knew was coming—Apple’s got their own smart glasses in the works and hopes to disrupt that wearable market similarly to how they did with smartwatches, which now generate an estimated $17 billion annually for the company.Rumors have been swirling about the tech giant’s inevitable foray into the smart glasses space for years, the most recent of those suggesting their first-gen specs, internally code-named “N50,” would be revealed to customers by the end of 2026 and sold early the next year. But developmental delays, a perennial hindrance for Apple, have officially pushed their planned release date back to later in 2027, presumably just in time for the holiday gift season.Sources told Gurman that current CEO Tim Apple (a.k.a. Tim Cook) is making development of these wearables his “top priority” before passing the company reins over to his successor John Ternus on September 1st. Fittingly, Ternus has been leading Apple’s Vision Products Group (VPG) for the past two years while they’ve been developing the product. However, this is the same group who’ve also been working on the forthcoming AirPod Pros with built-in infrared cameras, the announcement of which generated dread from segments of the internet wondering why such an upgrade was necessary, even if they won’t enable full-on scumbag behavior.The proposed glasses, on the other hand, explicitly seek to compete with Meta’s wearables and everything they’re used for. Priced in the $200 to $500 range, Apple’s glasses will come in a number of popular styles, have built-in cameras, speakers, and mics for taking videos, pics, and calls or playing music, podcasts, and Siri announcements. The main aesthetic difference between these and Meta’s current glasses roster is that Apple’s cameras will be ovular rather than circles. Gurman also believes that Apple’s glasses won’t have in-screen AR display capabilities like the latest Ray-Bans for at least a few years.It remains to be seen if these products are on track to become their next ubiquitous hit à la AirPods or will flop like the prohibitively expensive Vision Pro. But if those price points and society’s increasing indifference to the surveillance state are any indicators, it might be prudent to start polishing your Computer Vision Dazzle makeup skills just in case.
Source link
