DAILY NEWS

Stay Ahead, Stay Informed – Every Day

Advertisement
xAI Is Dead. Long Live SpaceXAI



In an effort to save tech bloggers from a lot of annoying typing, xAI has finally been rebranded: We are now @SpaceXAI. pic.twitter.com/ema66xDWC9 — SpaceXAI (@SpaceXAI) July 6, 2026   I’m elated. Do you have any idea how much I’ve dreaded writing about “xAI,” with its leading lowercase letter? How much I loathed explaining that the Elon Musk-owned operator of the Grok chatbot was acquired by Elon Musk-owned SpaceX back in February, before SpaceX became publicly-traded last month? The animation in SpaceXAI’s X post (did I forget to mention that SpaceXAI owns X?) is, sure, embarrassing, aesthetically speaking. Watch in awe as the xAI logo, which looked like it was made ten minutes before it was due in graphic design class, contorts into the famously gorgeous and beloved styling of the SpaceX logo—a breathtaking metamorphosis. Now you have to squint to even see the AI part. But, logo aside, it’s a massive win for clarity. It’s SpaceX… AI. SpaceXAI. I no longer have to explain anything. 

In March, Elon Musk said SpaceXAI’s signature product, Grok, was so flawed that it needed to be “rebuilt from the foundations up.” SpaceX then began the process of buying Cursor, an AI coding tool. Since then, Musk has claimed that Grok is progressing toward a “major improvement.”

Grok foundation model V9-Medium (1.5T) has finished training. Evals look good. A lot of Cursor data was added in supplementary training and there is more to come. Fine-tuning is underway and reinforcement learning begins in a few days. 2 to 3 weeks to public release. This will… — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 25, 2026   Last year, the company then called xAI reportedly spent $6.4 billion—twice its revenue. However, the AI division of SpaceX is absolutely critical to Elon Musk’s narrative about SpaceX’s future as a world-historically massive company with a “total addressable market” of $28.5 trillion. In this story, space infrastructure and space exploration are meant to be inextricably linked to AI. The SpaceX prospectus puts it in these terms: We believe AI infrastructure in space can utilize the virtually limitless power of the Sun and thereby enable the use of AI as a transformative force for understanding the universe and improving the daily lives of all humans. Elon Musk has also rattled off a version of this concept in oratory form, as he did during an all-hands meeting of xAI workers in February. That version contained, um, fanciful embellishments like this:

So the—the next step beyond Earth data centers are Earth orbital data centers, and we’ll be launching, with SpaceX, orbital data centers at the 100 to 200 gigawatt per year level. Not cumulative. I mean per year. And ultimately, we see a path to maybe launching as much as a terawatt per year of compute from Earth. But what if you want to go beyond a mere terawatt per year? In order to do that you have to go to the moon. Anyway, good luck to the folks at SpaceXAI who theoretically have to accomplish all of this while their parent company continues to seep into our equity markets despite the company’s governance structure making it impossible to fire Musk, no matter what happens. Goofy or not, this man’s harebrained ideas now have so much buy-in from our wealth-holding class, they sort of have to be true now, or we might all be screwed.



Source link

xAI Got Sued Over Its Gas Turbines, so It Naturally Added More of Them



In April, the NAACP sued Elon Musk’s xAI, alleging the company illegally operated 27 natural gas turbines without an air permit at its data center power plant in Southaven, Mississippi. Despite ongoing litigation, xAI has apparently added another 19 turbines to its fleet. According to the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, the company now has 46 “temporary-mobile” turbines at its Southaven facility, Mississippi Today reported Monday. Internal emails between an MDEQ official and a representative from Trinity Consultants, obtained by the Southern Environmental Law Center and shared with WIRED, reportedly show that xAI installed the additional 19 turbines between late March and early May.

Gizmodo was unable to independently verify these claims, and neither xAI nor the MDEQ immediately responded to a request for comment. Gas turbines surge amid AI boom Gas turbines are internal combustion engines that burn natural gas to spin a turbine and generate energy. Demand for them has surged amid the AI boom—tech companies are increasingly turning to on-site gas turbines to meet the enormous, around-the-clock energy demands of their data centers. They’re more efficient than conventional coal-fired power plants, but like any generator that burns fossil fuels, these turbines emit hazardous air pollutants, including nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, carbon monoxide, and volatile organic compounds. That’s why the Clean Air Act requires companies to obtain an air permit prior to installing and operating them.

In March, Mississippi regulators granted xAI a permit to build a 41-turbine power plant in Southaven to power its Colossus 1 and Colossus 2 data centers, located just across the Mississippi state line in Memphis, Tennessee. A month later, the NAACP, represented by the Southern Environmental Law Center and Earthjustice, sued the company for allegedly operating 27 gas turbines at the Southaven site between August and December 2025—before receiving an air permit.

A misinterpreted loophole? The state let xAI run those turbines during that period because they are mounted on flatbed trailers and therefore fall under a “temporary-mobile” exemption that allows them to operate without an air permit for up to a year, Mississippi Today reports. MDEQ also considers the 19 turbines reportedly added between March and May to be temporary mobile installations. That means no one is monitoring the air pollution generated by these 46 turbines. “Tens of thousands of people, including members of Plaintiffs NAACP and NAACP Mississippi State Conference (‘NAACP MS’), live, worship, study and work in the homes, churches, and schools that immediately surround the Colossus Gas Plant, and hundreds of thousands more live in the greater Memphis area,” the lawsuit states. “A much larger share of this population is Black than that of the country’s population as a whole.”

Southern Environmental Law Center attorneys argue this loophole doesn’t actually apply to xAI’s trailer-mounted turbines. The Clean Air Act defines a stationary turbine as “not self-propelled or intended to be propelled while performing its function. It may, however, be mounted on a vehicle for portability.” Earlier this month, the NAACP filed a request for a preliminary injunction to halt the operation of xAI’s “illegal power plant” while litigation proceeds, arguing that emergency action is necessary to “protect nearby communities that are facing imminent health harms.” The court has not yet ruled on the request.

This case highlights the growing tension between AI’s power demand and public health and safety, with marginalized communities bearing the brunt of the industry’s rapidly expanding impact. The outcome of this lawsuit will either set a precedent for stricter oversight of data center energy infrastructure or reinforce regulatory gray areas that put the public at risk.



Source link